The Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer: No. 5 – Syncora v. EMC

As summer approaches and the weather turns warmer, RMBS litigation is also heating up, generating long-awaited precedent that will dictate how mortgage losses are likely to be allocated by the courts.  In order to keep my readers apprised on what to watch for over the next three months in the key mortgage derivative lawsuits, I am launching a series called the Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer.   Starting today, and continuing over the next week, I will be analyzing the latest developments in one bellwether case per day in the world of RMBS litigation.  I will conclude the series with an article on possible end game scenarios, so that we can begin to understand how the subprime crisis will finally shake out, and what it will mean for the future of mortgage finance.  So, without further ado, I present case number 5 in the Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer.

Case No. 5 – Syncora v. EMC

Though patience is ordinarily a virtue, it’s a prerequisite in the world of residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) litigation.  That’s because progress in complex litigation always takes longer than anyone expects.

Take the lawsuit by bond insurer Syncora against mortgage lender EMC Mortgage (formerly a subsidiary of Bear Stearns that’s now wholly owned by JP Morgan Chase) as a prime example.  On December 19, 2011, Syncora v. EMC, Case No. 09-cv-3106 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) became the focus of significant attention when Reuters blogger Alison Frankel wrote that a partial summary judgment decision on the issue of loss causation was “imminent” and anticipated that we’d have a ruling in the case “before the end of this week.”  Sitting here nearly six months later, we are still awaiting that decision.

Of course, this isn’t Ms. Frankel’s fault – she provides some of the best and most timely coverage of RMBS litigation in the business.  Ms. Frankel was relying on statements made by His Honor himself, when Judge Paul Crotty announced at a hearing on October 12, 2011 that, “I think it would be in everybody’s interest to get a decision [on summary judgment] before we break for the holidays.  That’s what I’ll try to do.” (October 12 Transcript at 24:22-24)  Apparently, progress takes longer in complex litigation than even judges expect.

The good news is that we can finally see the light at the end of the tunnel.  A hearing on the summary judgment motion has been set for this Wednesday, June 13, 2012.  With the motion fully briefed and oral argument complete, Judge Crotty certainly should be able to hand down a decision by the end of the summer.  In fact, given the delay we’ve already seen and the importance of this decision to the case and the broader litigation landscape, I would expect the decision to come down by mid-July – but don’t hold me to it.  Judges work on their own schedules, and the demands of their dockets may force things to the back burner for far longer than we (or they) would like.

Whenever the decision comes down, there’s good reason to believe that Syncora’s patience will be rewarded.  Judging by Crotty’s previous decision on summary judgment, which I analyzed here, Hizzoner is none too pleased with EMC’s interpretation of its contractual responsibilities or conduct thus far in living up to those responsibilities.  Having previously declined to limit Syncora’s relief to the put-back remedy (which he famously described as being designed for “onesies and twosies”) and having authorized Syncora to use statistical sampling to prove its claims, I anticipate that Crotty will be similarly disinclined to limit Syncora’s access to the put-back remedy by adopting a narrow definition of materiality.

I’ve discussed at length how important the definition of materiality/loss causation will be to the ease of proof in put-back litigation.  No single issue would cause a bigger swing in the pendulum of losses from investors to banks than a ruling that put-backs do not require a showing that the identified breach of reps and warranties actually caused the loan to go into default.

Since Judge Eileen Bransten punted on that issue in her partial summary judgment ruling in another major monoline suit – MBIA v. Countrywide – Crotty could be the first to rule definitively on whether this is a viable defense.  If he goes the way I expect he will (and the way he should, given the strength of the arguments on each side) and rules that a breach must merely have a material impact on the riskiness of the loan rather than actually cause the borrower to stop making payments, it will provide clarity on the scope of repurchase liabilities and facilitate significantly larger recoveries for the monolines and RMBS investors.  It would also undermine the assumptions made by Bank of New York Mellon in settling Countrywide put-back claims for pennies on the dollar (tune in later this week to see if BNYM’s Article 77 proceeding makes the Top 5 list).

On the other hand, Crotty could also decide to punt on the issue, forcing litigants and commentators to put Guns N’ Roses’ classic track on repeat and dig deep for what’s left of our “Patience.”  Either way, this ruling is certainly one to watch for in the months to come.

Click here to continue to the next post in this series – Case No. 4 – and find out what recent ruling has the securitization industry worried and mobilizing against it…

About igradman

I am an attorney, consultant, book editor, and one of the nation's leading experts on mortgage backed securities litigation. I author The Subprime Shakeout mortgage litigation blog, am the Managing Member of MBS consulting firm IMG Enterprises, LLC, and am the editor of the newly released book, "Way Too Big to Fail: How Government and Private Industry Can Build a Fail-Safe Mortgage System," by Bill Frey. Follow me on Twitter @isaacgradman
This entry was posted in Alison Frankel, allocation of loss, Bank of New York, banks, Bear Stearns, broader credit crisis, contract rights, costs of the crisis, Countrywide, emc, investors, JPMorgan, Judge Eileen Bransten, Judge Paul Crotty, Judicial Opinions, lawsuits, lending guidelines, liabilities, litigation, loss causation, loss estimates, monoline actions, monolines, mortgage market, private label MBS, putbacks, rep and warranty, repurchase, responsibility, RMBS, subprime, The Subprime Shakeout, Trustees, underwriting guidelines, underwriting practices. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://www.subprimeshakeout.com/2012/06/the-top-5-rmbs-cases-no-4-retirement-v-bnym.html The Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer: No. 4 – Retirement Board v. Bank of New York Mellon | The Subprime Shakeout

    [...] Subscribe ← The Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer: No. 5 – Syncora v. EMC [...]

  • http://www.subprimeshakeout.com/2012/06/the-top-5-rmbs-cases-to-watch-abn-v-dinallo.html The Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer: No. 3 – ABN Ampro Bank v. Dinallo (Article 78) | The Subprime Shakeout

    [...] Post My Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch series began earlier this week with a look at a long-running lawsuit by bond insurer Syncora against EMC and a novel investor lawsuit against Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, both of which are being [...]

  • http://www.subprimeshakeout.com/2012/06/the-top-5-rmbs-cases-to-watch-no-2-in-re-bnym.html The Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer: No. 2 – In re the Application of Bank of New York Mellon | The Subprime Shakeout

    [...] of the Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer.  Click on the following links to read parts I, II, and III.  Today, we address a case that is anything but typical, but which if successful, [...]

  • http://www.teribuhl.com/2012/06/14/syncora-lawyers-could-clear-big-legal-hurdel-making-jp-morgan-pay-billions-in-putback-suits/ Syncora Lawyers Could Clear Big Legal Hurdel making JP Morgan pay Billions in Putback Suits « TERI BUHL

    [...] Attorney Isaac Gradman called the Syncora hearing one of the top five to watch this summer writing at his legal blog Subprime Shakeout: “I’ve discussed at length how important the definition of [...]

  • http://www.subprimeshakeout.com/2012/06/the-top-5-rmbs-cases-to-watch-no-1-mbia-v-countrywide.html The Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer: No. 1 – MBIA v. Countrywide, BofA | The Subprime Shakeout

    [...] 1 case in our countdown of RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer.  You may wish to catch up with parts I, II, III, and IV, if you haven’t already.  Though Case No. 2, Bank of New York’s [...]

  • http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2012/06/top-5-rmbs-cases-to-watch-no-3/ Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch: No. 3 | The Big Picture

    [...] Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch series began earlier this week with a look at a long-running lawsuit by bond insurer Syncora against EMC and a novel investor lawsuit against Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, both of which are being [...]

  • http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2012/06/top-5-rmbs-cases-to-watch-no-2/ Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch: No. 2 | The Big Picture

    [...] of the Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer.  Click on the following links to read parts I, II, and III.  Today, we address a case that is anything but typical, but which if successful, [...]

  • http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2012/06/top-5-rmbs-cases-to-watch-no-1/ Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch: No. 1 | The Big Picture

    [...] 1 case in our countdown of RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer.  You may wish to catch up with parts I, II, III, and IV, if you haven’t already.  Though Case No. 2, Bank of New York’s Article 77 [...]

  • http://www.subprimeshakeout.com/2012/07/federal-judge-refuses-to-narrow-mortgage-putback-claims-paving-way-for-lender-repurchase-liability.html Federal Judge Refuses to Narrow Mortgage Putback Claims, Paving Way for Lender Repurchase Liability | The Subprime Shakeout

    [...] No. 5 – Syncora v. EMC [...]

  • http://www.subprimeshakeout.com/2012/08/investor-end-games-all-is-not-well-in-the-garden.html Investor End Games: All Is Not Well in the Garden | The Subprime Shakeout

    [...] believe our court system still largely functions as it was designed to, albeit more slowly than we might like.  This is why I have been advocating for years for investors to get organized [...]

  • http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2012/09/investor-end-games-all-is-not-well-in-the-garden/ Investor End Games: All Is Not Well in the Garden | The Big Picture

    [...] believe our court system still largely functions as it was designed to, albeit more slowly than we might like.  This is why I have been advocating for years for investors to get organized [...]

  • http://www.nwmortgagetips.com/loan-modification-forum/ Loan Modification Forum

    [...] First-Time Home Buyers in CaliforniaCosts for First Time Home Buyers – Ann Arbor Real Estate BlogThe Top 5 RMBS Cases to Watch this Summer: No. 5 – Syncora v. EMC [...]